Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 4/28/2003

State v. Davis

Citations

580 S.E.2d 778
354 S.C. 348
2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that \[a] reviewing court should give great deference to a magistrate's determination of probable cause\
holding Franks issue was not preserved for review when the defendant did not assert below that false information was intentionally or recklessly included in the affidavit and the trial judge made no ruling on that issue
stating \a reviewing court should give great deference to a magistrate's determination of probable cause\
\[T]he law is well settled that the officer's knowledge of general trends in criminal behavior is a relevant consideration in determining probable cause.\
there is no violation of Franks v. Delaware , 438 U.S. 154 (1978), if the affidavit, including the omitted data, still contains sufficient information to establish probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Cureton, Stilwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.