Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 392 S.E.2d 182
  • 301 S.C. 371
  • 1990 S.C. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding an affidavit defective because it “sets forth no facts as to why police believed Smith” committed the robbery
  • determining an affidavit was defective because it \set[ ] forth no facts as to why police believed\ the defendant had committed the crime
  • finding an affidavit defective on its face when it set forth no facts as to why police believed a defendant committed a robbery and omitted the fact that some of the information in the affidavit was provided by an informant
  • finding mere conclusory statements which give a magistrate no basis to make a judgment regarding probable cause are insufficient as the magistrate's actions \cannot be a mere ratification of the bare conclusions of others\ (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 239 (1983))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chandler, Gregory, Harwell, Finney, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.