Supreme Court· 6/18/1990

Pennsylvania v. Muniz

Citations

496 U.S. 582
110 S. Ct. 2638
110 L. Ed. 2d 528
1990 U.S. LEXIS 3211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that drunk driver’s failure to respond to question asking the year of his sixth birthday is inadmissible
holding that a question to a DWI suspect asking him to give the date of his sixth birthday was custodial interrogation subject to Miranda
holding that drunk driver’s failure to respond to question asking the year of his sixth birthday is inadmissable
holding that “compulsion which makes a suspect or accused the source of real or physical evidence does not violate [the Fifth Amendment privilege]”
holding that such information in no way imputes criminal wrongdoing and, as such, is not protected by the Fifth Amendment
holding that the exception applied where the officer “asked only routine questions to help with the booking process” at the police station

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brennan, Rehnquist, White, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

643 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Pennsylvania v. Muniz

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.