Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 522 So. 2d 201
  • 1988 WL 11378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that recording helps to demonstrate voluntariness, context, and content of statement
  • noting that recording helps to demonstrate voluntariness, context, and content of statement
  • refusing to require electronic recording of custodial interrogation as a prerequisite to admissibility
  • \[T]he appellant bears the burden of presenting a record which is sufficient to undergird his assignments of error.\
  • the mere absence of a tape recording does not make statements made during custodial interrogation inadmissible
  • no federal or state requirement that confessions be recorded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Sullivan and Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.