United States v. Irvin Quinn Hines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a charged firearm possession offense is not closely related to an uncharged firearm possession offense because the “place, time, and person involved were all different”
• holding that a defendant’s reference to his lawyer during an interview was not an invocation of his Miranda rights because he was not in custody
• “Edwards rule does not apply to suspects who are not in continuous custody between the time they request counsel and the time they are reinterviewed”
• \Edwards rule does not apply to suspects who are not in continuous custody between the time they request counsel and the time they are reinterviewed\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).