Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/27/2013

State v. Hurd

Citations

298 Kan. 555
316 P.3d 696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

if the complaint omits an essential element it deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction to convict the defendant
if the complaint omits an essential element it deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction to convict the defendant
“Thus, we conclude Hurd’s affidavit failed to allege facts requiring Judge Peterson’s recusal under K.S.A. 20-31 Id.”
“Recusal is required under the Fourteenth Amendments Due Process Clause when the judge is actually biased or there is a constitutionally intolerable probability of actual bias. [Citation omitted.]”
\Recusal is required under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause when the judge is actually biased or there is a 113 constitutionally intolerable probability of actual bias. [Citation omitted.]\
\Recusal is required under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause when the judge is actually biased or there is a constitutionally intolerable probability of actual bias.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moritz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.