Skip to main content

State v. Sellers

Citations

  • 301 Kan. 540
  • 344 P.3d 950
  • 2015 Kan. LEXIS 164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that K.S.A. 22-3503 is not a procedural vehicle supporting a defense motion for arrest of judgment
  • explaining that courts presume that the legislature does not intend to enact useless or meaningless legislation
  • discussing and applying this deadline for motion for arrest of judgment
  • subject-matter jurisdiction presents question of law subject to de novo review
  • \K.S.A. 22-3503 is not a procedural vehicle that supports a defense motion for arrest of judgment long after a direct appeal has been pursued and decided. It is meant to permit a district judge to arrest judgment sua sponte before a direct appeal is taken.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.