Skip to main content

Flannery v. Flannery

Citations

  • 452 P.2d 846
  • 203 Kan. 239
  • 1969 Kan. LEXIS 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that judge may be required to recuse if defendant proves conflict of interest
  • trial judge could resume jurisdiction of the case after \the matter which had required his disqualification appeared to have been finally adjudicated\
  • judge can reassume jurisdiction where original cause for disqualification has been removed or has ceased to exist
  • judge may reassume jurisdiction over case where “the reason for his prior disqualification had been resolved”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fontron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.