Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/13/1995

State v. Anthony

Citations

257 Kan. 1003
898 P.2d 1109
1995 Kan. LEXIS 92
1995 WL 362544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding no abuse of discretion even though 97.5% of those surveyed had heard of the case and 63.8% of those surveyed felt the evidence was strong against the defendant
finding no abuse of discretion even though 97.5% of those surveyed had heard of the case and 63.8% of those surveyed felt the evidence was strong against the defendant
finding no abuse of discretion even though 97.5% of those surveyed had heard of the case and 63.8% of those surveyed felt the evidence was strong against the defendant
no error to deny motion to change venue despite defendant’s public opinion poll of Safina residents showing 97.5 percent had heard of case, 63.8 percent believed evidence strong
counsel would not enter an appearance in case without first securing a continuance
companion case to Swafford, court found no abuse of discretion even though 97.5 percent of those surveyed had heard of the case and 63.8 percent of those surveyed felt die evidence was strong against the defendant; court made same observations regarding voir dire as it did in Swafford

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.