Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/26/2013
State v. Sawyer
Citations
- 297 Kan. 902
- 305 P.3d 608
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to consider disagreements with district court's rulings in recusal analysis because \[a]dverse legal rulings alone cannot form the basis for a recusal\
- discussing the three substantive bases on which a litigant may argue that a judge's recusal is required
- \mere heightened risk of actual bias\ on district court's part \could lead to unacceptable peril to due process\
- 'We judge the adequacy of due process under a de novo standard of appellate review.'
- allegations in affidavit that judge prevented pro se pleadings and ordered defendant transported gag in place were not, without more detail, legally sufficient to force recusal because this is not always unjustified
- allegations in affidavit that judge prevented pro se pleadings and ordered defendant transported gag in place were not, 24 without more detail, legally sufficient to force recusal because this is not always unjustified
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beier, Biles, Moritz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-07-25· cited 125×
- State v. MoyerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-10-16· cited 77×
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-12-27· cited 56×
- State v. MoyerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-02-15· cited 12×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2024-02-02· cited 10×
- State v. MoyerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2017-05-17
- In re Marriage of BushCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2022-06-10
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court· 1975-04-16· cited 2,322×
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court· 1997-06-09· cited 1,476×
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 1,119×
- Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 488×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-09-21· cited 301×
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-04-27· cited 148×
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-23· cited 109×
- State v. RaskieSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-02-17· cited 105×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-02· cited 99×
- Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCHMontana Supreme Court· 2012-05-18· cited 90×
- State v. HolmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-24· cited 81×
- State v. HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-03-17· cited 73×
- State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-10-26· cited 65×
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-10-31· cited 49×
- Wilson v. SebeliusSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-07-11· cited 48×
- Davis v. JonesEleventh Circuit· 2007-11-08· cited 45×
- State v. HarknessSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-03-05· cited 37×
- In Re Peter Larson, in Re Neal Larson Robert Farrar Black Hills Institute of Geological Research Terry Wentz Edwin Allen Cole Jun ShimizuEighth Circuit· 1994-12-29· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.