State v. Dimaplas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “KRPC 3.7 prohibits a lawyer from being an advocate at a trial” [emphasis added]
• applying de novo review and finding Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct did not preclude one attorney in the Saline County Attorney's Office from prosecuting a case in which another attorney from that same office was a material witness
• standard of appellate review on whether disciplinary rule prohibits certain professional conduct question of law subject to plenary review
• trial court reversed for disqualifying entire county attorney's office; \appearance of impropriety\ no longer the standard for conflict of interest matters
• finding “appearance of impropriety” approach to be no longer viable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).