Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/6/2025

State v. Webb

Citations

342 Or. App. 426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting the defendant’s pro se supplemental assignments of error because they were unpreserved and the defendant did not request plain error review
“Insofar as defendant requests plain error review in his supplemental reply briefing, he waived the argument by failing to raise it in his opening brief.”
“Insofar as defendant requests plain error review in his supplemental reply briefing, he waived the argument by failing to raise it in his opening brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pag�n

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.