Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 4/2/2019
State v. Horton
Citations
- 826 S.E.2d 770
- 264 N.C. App. 711
Syllabus
Reasonable suspicion Anonymous tip High-crime area
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the fact that a defendant was in front of a closed building where there were no other cars present in an area where a business across the street experienced prior break-ins was insufficient to support an officer’s reasonable articulable suspicion
- holding the fact that a defendant was in front of a closed building where there were no other cars present in an area where a business across the street experienced prior break-ins was insufficient to support an officer’s reasonable articulable suspicion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Inman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,787×
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,350×
- State v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-06-08· cited 24×
- State v. Myers-McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-11-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.