Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/10/1978
State v. Horton
Citations
- 248 S.E.2d 263
- 271 S.C. 413
- 1978 S.C. LEXIS 348
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that offense of hit- and-run is contrary to justice, honesty and good morals, involves moral turpitude, and therefore, properly admitted into evidence as bearing on appellant’s credibility
- concluding “[o]ne who leaves the scene of an accident is fraudulently attempting to relieve himself of any liability” and leaving the scene of an auto accident “is contrary to justice, honesty and good morals.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ness, Lewis, Littlejohn, Rhodes, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2006-07-05· cited 60×
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-22· cited 50×
- Todd v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-08-21· cited 30×
- State v. LaBargeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-21· cited 27×
- Benitez v. DunevantArizona Supreme Court· 2000-07-31· cited 22×
- State v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-06-09· cited 19×
- State v. BallSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-04-13· cited 17×
- State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-06-05· cited 16×
- Frederickson v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-06-25· cited 10×
- In the Matter of SipesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-06· cited 7×
- Todd v. SC FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INS. CO.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-08-21· cited 6×
- State v. DrakefordSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-11-03· cited 6×
- Derendal v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-27· cited 2×
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BETHEASupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2024-05-14· cited 2×
- Cambas v. Department of Business & Professional RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-13· cited 1×
- Baddourah v. BaddourahSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2021-03-10
- Baddourah v. McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2021-03-10
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.