Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/29/2021

State v. Hubbell

Citations

314 Or. App. 844
500 P.3d 728

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that someone who has taken a substantial step towards the crime of delivery but has not yet attempted the transfer itself will have committed the inchoate crime of attempted delivery of a controlled substance
explaining that “Boyd’s leap—defining the word ‘attempt’ within a sub- stantive statute to be the inchoate crime of attempt—was not just wrong but plainly wrong”
explaining that Boyd wrongly conflated “attempted transfer” in the delivery statutes with the inchoate crime of “attempt”
quot- ing Webster’s Third New Int’l Dictionary at 22 (unabridged ed 2002) (emphasis in original)
same where defendant possessed an “exception- ally large” quantity of fentanyl, along with separate packag- ing for smaller doses
large amount of fentanyl and separate packaging for smaller doses sufficient for jury to determine substantial step toward delivery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.