Skip to main content

State v. Horner

Citations

  • 272 Or. App. 355
  • 356 P.3d 111
  • 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where evidence might be relevant, and not just conditionally relevant under a doctrine-of-chances theory of intent, it is not obvious that the trial court errs by not employing the Leistiko framework
  • unpreserved argument regarding Leistiko analysis is not plain error in light of Williams
  • unpreserved argument regarding Leistiko is not plain error in light of Williams

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan, Sercombe, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.