Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/27/2005

State v. Jacobs

Citations

117 P.3d 290
200 Or. App. 665
2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that a defen- dant has a right to be present when the court announces a sentence and to object thereto
explaining that a defendant has a statutory and constitutional right to be present at sentencing and the trial court’s failure to “pronounce the sentence in open court in [the] defendant’s presence” violated that right
identifying the statutory source as ORS 137.030 and the constitutional sources as Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
hold- ing that trial court’s error in pronouncing judgment out- side the defendant’s presence was not harmless, because it denied the defendant the opportunity to plead for leniency or make any other argument or statement about his sen- tence
remanding for resentencing under similar circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Armstrong, Deits

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.