Skip to main content

State v. Riley

Citations

  • 97 P.3d 1269
  • 195 Or. App. 377
  • 2004 Ore. App. LEXIS 1223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a criminal defendant has both a statutory right and a constitutional right to be present when a court makes a substantive sentence modification
  • modification of judgment to add required term under repeat offender statute, ORS 137.635, occurred “entirely by operation of law”; the defendant’s absence therefore was not “prejudicial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Landau, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.