State v. Jacob

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court acted within its discretion when it “limited the line of questioning to ensure that char- acter issues were not brought up and made other limita- tions to avoid misuse of the testimony”
• concluding that the trial court acted within its discretion when it “limited the line of questioning to ensure that char- acter issues were not brought up and made other limita- tions to avoid misuse of the testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Rienstra
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-13· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
• State v. Vanornum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 546×
• State v. O'Key
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-07-07· cited 243×
• State v. Flores Ramos
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-12-24· cited 218×
• State v. Lawson/James
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-11-29· cited 143×
• State v. Titus
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 143×
• Davis v. O'BRIEN
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-04-06· cited 135×
• State v. Pitt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-10-18· cited 80×
• State v. Reyes-Camarena
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-07-28· cited 67×
• State v. Shaw
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-06-16· cited 64×
• State v. Supanchick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-02-13· cited 18×
• State v. Pergande
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-04-08· cited 16×
• State v. Horner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-22· cited 11×
• State v. SUPANCHICK
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-28· cited 8×
• Koenig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-06· cited 2×