Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/6/2013

State v. Holt

Citations

298 Kan. 469
313 P.3d 826
2013 WL 6388352
2013 Kan. LEXIS 1301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing the general rule from Deavers when evaluating the second and third factors from Raschke
treating movant's motion for new trial as a motion for habeas relief under K.S.A. 60-1507
stating there are four factors to consider in determining whether the Legislature's use of \shall\ makes a statutory provision mandatory or directory
finding dismissal of K.S.A. 60-1507 motion was proper due to its untimely filing, so no need to address district court's additional holding that motion was successive
noting the panel considering Holt's second K.S.A. 60-1507 motion found Holt's jury bias claim \could have been raised on direct appeal or in his first 60- 1507 motion\
articulating four factors to determine whether “shall” makes particular statutory provision mandatory or directory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.