· 10/30/2009
Zimmerman v. Board of County Commissioners
Citations
- 218 P.3d 400
- 289 Kan. 926
- 2009 Kan. LEXIS 1073
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that zoning authorities may consider aesthetics in zoning decisions and that some considerations may outweigh other Golden factors
- explaining that a zoning authority may weigh a factor such as aesthetics more heavily than other factors
- noting that appellant bears the burden of establishing unreasonableness of the zoning board’s action
- statutoiy interpretation is a question of law; appellate court not bound by district court interpretation
- cities’ and coun ties’ power to change zoning of property ‘ “can only be exercised in conformity with the statute which authorizes the zoning” ’
- \An appellate court merely interprets the language as it appears; it is not free to speculate and cannot read into the statute language not readily found there.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nuss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.