State v. Raschke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting rule and applying it to hold that mandatory fines for repeat forgery offenders control over the statute governing fines generally and its provision allowing a court to take ability to pay into account
• \We reject this claim as controlled by . . . [Ivory]. It requires no further discussion.\
• \We reject this claim as controlled by . . . [Ivory]. It requires no further discussion.\
• \[W]e have often noted that a specific statute controls over a general statute.\
• considering K.S.A. 21-4607 and fine provision
• noting several cases interpreting \shall\ as mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).