Skip to main content

State v. McDaniel

Citations

  • 254 P.3d 534
  • 292 Kan. 443
  • 2011 Kan. LEXIS 241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that restitution paid to Medicaid for the victim's medical expenses does not invoke evidentiary hearing under K.S.A. 22-3424
  • agreeing with Kansas Court of Appeals' holding in State v. Bryant, 37 Kan. App. 2d 924, 930, 163 P.3d 325 [2007], finding that the word shall was directory rather than mandatory as used in K.S.A. 22-3424[d]
  • “We leave consider ation of tlie substance of McDaniel’s criticism and synthesis of Trostle, Anthony, and Cooper for another day, because the facts before us simply do not support an argument that any change in sentence took place.”
  • restitution is part of a defendant's sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.