Skip to main content
· 12/3/2004

State v. McCoin

Citations

  • 2004 Kan. LEXIS 727
  • 101 P.3d 1204
  • 278 Kan. 465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter an order, this court also lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal
  • relying on K.S.A. 22-3502 (Furse), which stated a \motion for arrest of judgment shall be made within 10 days . . . or within such further time as the court may fix during the 10-day period\; motion filed 2 years after entering plea was untimely
  • if district court lacks jurisdiction, appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction over subject matter on appeal
  • if district court lacks jurisdiction, appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction over subject matter on appeal
  • “If the district court’s order was entered without jurisdiction, then an appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction on appeal.”
  • sentence in violation of McAdam not “illegal” and thus not candidate for modification under K.S.A. 22-3504

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gernon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.