Skip to main content
· 2/28/1997

Ajabu v. State

Citations

  • 677 N.E.2d 1035
  • 1997 Ind. App. LEXIS 80
  • 1997 WL 82783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “threats include those a person makes known to the victim through the print, radio[,] or television media with the requisite intent”
  • providing that the evidence supported the conclusion that Ajabu used the media to communicate threats that he knew or had good reason to believe would reach the threatened individuals
  • explaining that “threats include those a person makes known to Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 49A02-1706-CR-1371| May 24, 2018 Page 8 of 13 the victim through the print, radio[,] or television media with the requisite intent”
  • statute does not limit means utilized to convey threat, so threats made through media were communicated to victims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Robertson, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.