State v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting pretrial amendment that added new crime because court determined amendment did not prejudice substantial rights of defendant
• \A reasonable person could find that these acts or transactions were in furtherance of a common scheme or plan to sell drugs and to 'discipline' new recruits.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
• State v. Grissom
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-11-10· cited 133×
• State v. Jacques
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-08· cited 73×
• State v. Hayden
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-03-17· cited 73×
• State v. Tyler
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-10-30· cited 61×
• State v. Scott
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-02-28· cited 47×
• State v. Hill
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-06-02· cited 46×
• State v. Bischoff
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-03-17· cited 41×
• State v. Donaldson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 39×
• State v. Crawford
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1994-04-15· cited 34×
• State v. Mason
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-02-28· cited 25×
• State v. Calderon-Aparicio
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-10-29· cited 21×
• Gordon v. Eighth Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1996-03-01· cited 13×
• State v. Eastridge
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-04-28· cited 12×
• State v. Long
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1999-12-10· cited 12×
• State v. Spangler
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-12-21· cited 12×
• Bedard v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2002-06-12· cited 10×
• In re J.T.M.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1996-07-26· cited 9×
• State v. Marino
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1996-11-27· cited 6×
• Swenson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-05-19· cited 6×