Court of Appeals of Kansas· 10/21/2011

State v. Waldrup

Citations

263 P.3d 867
46 Kan. App. 2d 656
2011 Kan. App. LEXIS 150

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a simple case and a 23-month delay was presumptively prejudicial
explaining that the UMDDA applies to inmates confined in a penal or correctional institution in the State of Kansas, while the Agreement on Detainers applies to inmates confined in penal or correctional institutions in another state or in a federal penitentiary
holding jury instruction’s explanatory definition of sale of cocaine did not create alternative means of committing crime because the broad definition of the term “sale” did not reasonably confuse the jury about what criminal conduct the State had to prove to find defendant guilty
alternative means challenge can be raised for the first time on appeal because it implicates insufficiency of evidence to support the conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Malone, Marquardt, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.