Skip to main content

State v. Harwell

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 643

Syllabus

Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial. Defendant's motion for a new trial was untimely, and defendant did not demonstrate that he was unavoidably prevented from timely filing the motion for a new trial or discovering new evidence within the time period provided by Crim.R. 33(B). Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.