State v. Reed

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 3295

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. Appellant did not establish that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the evidence upon which he relied. Appellant's alleged newly discovered evidence did not support a conclusion that the State withheld exculpatory evidence, nor did it support a conclusion that the State's witnesses who were co-defendants in another matter in another county received a benefit for their testimony in this case. Judgment affirmed.