State v. Armstrong
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 191
Syllabus
Trial court properly denied defendant's \motion for court to consider evidence that gun spec has already been served.\ Defendant cannot raise issues unrelated to the motion on appeal. Defendant was not convicted of a gun specification in this case, and defendant's motion was not the proper avenue to challenge the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction's determination of his sentence expiration date. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.