Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3591

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for leave to file motion for new trial and his motion for new trial. The trial court reasonably found that appellant's motions, which were based on alleged illegal hybrid representation while his case was pending before the trial court, were untimely. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.