Skip to main content

State v. Kendrick

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 634

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by denying appellant's petition for post-conviction relief, because the trial court did not have jurisdiction to consider the untimely, successive petition and because the claims asserted in the petition were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Although the trial court erred by denying appellant's petition prematurely, the error was harmless and may be properly disregarded under Crim.R. 52(A). Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.