State v. Harwell
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3657
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for leave to file a motion to vacate his 2013 conviction or for a new trial. The evidence that any potential DNA on shell casings from the scene of the shooting had been contaminated by a firearm examiner was not newly discovered evidence and did not create a strong probability of a different result at trial, given the overwhelming evidence of appellant's guilt. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. Nolan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-05· cited 54×
- State v. LenoirOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-15· cited 17×
- State v. HilerOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-15· cited 16×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-31· cited 15×
- State v. HarwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-22· cited 12×
- State v. SellsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-17· cited 11×
- State v. DevaughnsOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-02-06· cited 7×
- State v. RidleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-04· cited 4×
- State v. HarwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-05· cited 4×
- State v. HarwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-09· cited 3×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-27· cited 2×
- State v. MotenOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.