Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/22/2021
State v. Harwell
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3754
Syllabus
Appellant's motion to vacate his conviction for felony murder was properly denied by the trial court because the argument raised therein was barred by the doctrine of res judicata and the motion was an untimely petition for post-conviction relief that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to consider. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 802×
- State v. SaxonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-03-20· cited 624×
- State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-14· cited 319×
- State v. Nolan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-05· cited 54×
- State v. CurrentOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-10· cited 28×
- State v. ClineOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-10· cited 12×
- State v. HarwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-22· cited 12×
- State v. HousleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-27· cited 10×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-08· cited 9×
- State v. BecraftOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-14· cited 7×
- State v. LawrenceOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-04· cited 5×
- State v. JenningsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-03· cited 5×
- State v. HarwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-10-09· cited 3×
- State v. RameyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-30· cited 3×
- State v. Beatty-JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.