Oregon Supreme Court· 12/13/1973
State v. McManus
Citations
- 517 P.2d 250
- 267 Or. 238
- 1973 Ore. LEXIS 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \We conclude that the defendant can contest the accuracy of or the negligent mistake in an affidavit by a motion to suppress before trial without first filing a motion to controvert as provided by statute.\
- “We conclude that the defendant can contest the accuracy of or the negligent mistake in an affidavit by a motion to suppress before trial without first filing a motion to controvert as provided by statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connell, Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Bryson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court· 2007-05-24· cited 114×
- State v. HarpOregon Supreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 40×
- State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-04-21· cited 30×
- State v. GoodlowCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-07-01· cited 22×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-05-28· cited 12×
- State v. HermachCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-08-03· cited 11×
- State v. O'KEEFECourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-06-18· cited 9×
- State v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-06-13· cited 7×
- State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-03-02· cited 6×
- State v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-12-21· cited 3×
- State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-07-18· cited 3×
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-03-20· cited 3×
- State v. GoecksCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-27· cited 2×
- State v. WeistCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-11· cited 1×
- State v. ThorfinnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-06-09
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 5,133×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 4,485×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,806×
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 1,231×
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 725×
- Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-11-06· cited 629×
- Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-05-25· cited 249×
- Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-09-28· cited 209×
- Aday v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-05-11· cited 172×
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 101×
- People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-07-11· cited 80×
- State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court· 1971-09-22· cited 79×
- In Re SterlingCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-11-05· cited 68×
- State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court· 1968-10-02· cited 63×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.