Oregon Supreme Court· 8/14/2003

State v. Hale

Citations

75 P.3d 448
335 Or. 612
75 P.3d 612
2003 Ore. LEXIS 571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “[e]ach judgment should enumerate separately the aggravating factors on which each conviction was based * * * [and] each judgment entering a single conviction for aggravated murder for each victim should impose a single sentence of death”
noting that lack of concurrence instruction could cause “jury confusion”
defendant sought notice by challenging the indictment as impermissibly vague and asking the court to send the matter back to the jury for clarification of the facts and circum- stances underlying the charge
not- ing that lack of concurrence instruction could cause “jury confusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Riggs, De Muniz Balmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.