Oregon Supreme Court· 12/28/1977

State v. Sanders

Citations

572 P.2d 1307
280 Or. 685
1977 Ore. LEXIS 771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an indictment for burglary must specify which “crime” it charges that the defendant intended to commit when he allegedly unlawfully entered a building
concluding that an indictment must “specify[] the intent which the defendant is charged with having at the time of the breaking and entering”
holding that a burglary indictment is required to specify the crime a defendant is alleged to have intended to commit at the time of the unlawful entry
analyzing whether, in addition to elements of offense, burglary indictment must allege specific crime that defendant intended to commit at time of unlawful entry
where trial court instructed on theft, it was harmless error for the information not to specify the intended crime
where trial court instructed on theft, it was harmless error for the information not to specify the intended crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.