Skip to main content
· 12/14/2011

State v. Prange

Citations

  • 268 P.3d 749
  • 247 Or. App. 254
  • 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1655

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that impeachment 592 State v. Houston evidence for bias or interest is relevant whenever, from the evidence sought to be introduced, the bias or interest “is a mat- ter of reasonable inference rather than mere speculation”
  • evidence of hostility between victim’s family and defendant’s family was relevant to whether victim’s account of alleged crimes was credible
  • “Unless there is a reason to exclude relevant evidence, it must be received.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.