Oregon Supreme Court· 11/24/2021

Antoine v. Taylor

Citations

368 Or. 760
499 P.3d 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

quot- ing State v. Cohen, 289 Or 525, 529, 614 P2d 1156 (1980)
the peti- tioner did not present “any evidence” that his reading of the law “was widely shared or even that any other attorney had read [the law] in that manner prior to [the appellate court decision]”
“To prove deficient performance, it is not enough to show that another lawyer would have tried the Nonprecedential Memo Op: 329 Or App 335 (2023) 337 case differently or that a reviewing court would disagree with that counsel’s decision.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
“To prove deficient performance, it is not enough to show that another lawyer would have tried the Nonprecedential Memo Op: 329 Or App 335 (2023) 337 case differently or that a reviewing court would disagree with that counsel’s decision.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Antoine v. Taylor

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.