United States v. Hector M. Rodriguez-Estrada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the prosecutor’s obligation to desist from the use of pejorative language . . . is every bit as solemn as his obligation to attempt to bring the guilty to account.”
• describing jurors as \the judges of the witnesses' demeanor and credibility\ even though jurors make no specific findings about a witness's demeanor
• affirming, in a case where defendant was charged with twenty counts of embezzlement for misappropriating twenty weekly expense allowances, the admission under Rule 404(b
• comparing evidence, findings, and issues between earlier civil and later criminal trials
• comparing evidence, findings, and issues between earlier civil and later criminal trials
• “the prosecutor’s obligation to desist from the use of pejorative language and inflammatory rhetoric is every bit as solemn as his obligation to attempt to bring the guilty to account.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).