Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/3/2011

State v. Dickerson

Citations

716 S.E.2d 895
395 S.C. 101
2011 S.C. LEXIS 312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“The admission of evidence is within the [trial] court’s discretion and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion.”
\The admission of evidence is within the circuit court's discretion and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion.\
\The admission of evidence is within the [trial] court's discretion and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion.\
\The admission of evidence is within the [trial] court's discretion and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion.\
\The admission of evidence is within the circuit court's discretion and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion.\
\The admission of evidence is within the circuit court's discretion and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hearn, Kittredge, Moore, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.