Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/22/1991
State v. Blackmon
Citations
- 403 S.E.2d 660
- 304 S.C. 270
- 1991 S.C. LEXIS 89
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the legislature, and not the court, is responsible for amending laws to resolve inconsistencies
- holding that the legislature, and not the court, is responsible for amending laws to resolve inconsistencies
- recognizing the settled rule that penal statutes must be strictly construed in the defendant’s favor
- recognizing the settled rule that penal statutes must be strictly construed in the defendant's favor
- in interpreting a statute, the Court’s primary function is to ascertain the intention of the legislature
- “[W]hen a statute is penal in nature, it must be construed strictly against the State and in favor of the defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Whitner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-10-27· cited 99×
- Johnson v. Collins Entertainment Co.Fourth Circuit· 1999-12-27· cited 86×
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-09-25· cited 79×
- Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-01-11· cited 79×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-01-27· cited 73×
- Sloan v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-01-08· cited 72×
- Town of Mt. Pleasant v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-11· cited 68×
- State v. LandisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-12-06· cited 61×
- Martin v. StewartFourth Circuit· 2007-08-29· cited 60×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 44×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-08-30· cited 41×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-25· cited 37×
- State v. ArdSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-09-14· cited 27×
- State v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-11-18· cited 27×
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-09-14· cited 26×
- Martin v. CondonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-12-09· cited 24×
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-10-20· cited 21×
- Gorge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-05-10· cited 20×
- Sloan Construction Co. v. Southco Grassing, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-03-24· cited 19×
- State v. BaucomSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-08· cited 19×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.