Skip to main content

State v. Hudgins

Citations

  • 460 S.E.2d 388
  • 319 S.C. 233
  • 1995 S.C. LEXIS 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the appellant's objection \on the general ground that the prejudicial impact outweighed the probative value\ was different from the ground raised on appeal and the issue was thus unpreserved
  • refusing to address constitutional issue that was not raised at trial
  • an issue is not preserved if party argues one ground for objection at trial and another ground on appeal
  • wherein Chief Justice Finney concurred with majority’s holding with which he did not agree as he recognized stare decisis bound him to the result
  • wherein Chief Justice Finney concurred with majority's holding with which he did not agree as he recognized stare decisis bound him to the result
  • an issue not raised to the trial court is procedurally barred on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Chandler, Finney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.