Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/16/2004
Harden v. State
Citations
- 360 S.C. 405
- 602 S.E.2d 48
- 2004 S.C. LEXIS 193
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating trial counsel was not deficient in not objecting when there was \no statutory law or judicial precedent in this State\ on which to base an objection
- stating trial counsel was not deficient in not objecting when there was “no statutory law or judicial precedent in this State” on which to base an objection
- petitioner bears the burden of proving both attorney error and prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Moore, Pleicones, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-08-28· cited 1,001×
- Brightman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-08-23· cited 56×
- McCray v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-02-27· cited 34×
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-08-09· cited 29×
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-01-02· cited 25×
- State v. GordonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-10-20· cited 21×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-07· cited 21×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-04-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.