Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 4/3/2008

State v. Page

Citations

663 S.E.2d 357
378 S.C. 476
2008 S.C. App. LEXIS 312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding Page opened the door to testimony due to his questions on the detective's investigative techniques and the sufficiency of evidence linked to Page because otherwise inadmissible evidence may be properly admitted when opposing counsel opens the door to that evidence
\It is firmly established that otherwise inadmissible evidence may be properly admitted when opposing counsel opens the door to that evidence.\
\It is firmly established that otherwise inadmissible evidence may be properly admitted when [the defendant] opens the door to that evidence.\
\It is firmly established that otherwise inadmissible evidence may be properly admitted when opposing counsel opens the door to that evidence.\
\It is firmly established that otherwise inadmissible evidence may be properly admitted when opposing counsel opens the door to that evidence.\
\An abuse of discretion occurs when the conclusions of the trial court either lack evidentiary support or are controlled by an error of law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hearn, Kittredge, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.