State v. Huggins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the death penalty was warranted where defendant robbed and shot the victim
• holding that the death penalty was warranted where defendant robbed and shot the victim
• holding because appellant failed to raise the argument that his sentencing phase was unconstitutional to the circuit court, the issue was not preserved for review
• stating an issue may not be raised for the first time on appeal
• it is well settled that issues cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
• it is well settled that issues may not be raised for the first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Shuler
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 104×
• State v. Gillian
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-06-11· cited 52×
• State v. Mercer
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-01-12· cited 36×
• State v. Weik
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-09-03· cited 22×
• State v. Bennett
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-26· cited 14×
• State v. Lindsey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-20· cited 7×
• State v. Finklea
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-07-26· cited 6×
• State v. Watson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-17· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Patterson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-02-28· cited 98×
• State v. Shaw
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-05-28· cited 91×
• State v. McWee
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-06-10· cited 41×
• The STATE v. Cannon
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1956-07-19· cited 8×
• State v. Gardner
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-09-14· cited 7×