State v. Poehnelt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no error in permitting expert to testify about battered- child syndrome in child-abuse case even though it pertained to the ultimate issue
• “[e]xpert testimony to establish that injuries were intentional and not accidental [is] admissible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 304×
• State v. Trostle
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 187×
• Martin v. Reinstein
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-05-13· cited 153×
• State v. George
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-11-26· cited 49×
• State v. DePiano
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-09-05· cited 31×
• State v. Crane
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-05-31· cited 18×
• Alejandro v. Harrison
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-05-22· cited 18×
• State v. Winkle
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-08-13· cited 16×
• State v. Greene
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-01-31· cited 13×
• J.L. v. L.M.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2001-06-22· cited 10×
• State v. Ibanez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-18· cited 9×
• State v. DePiano
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-01-10· cited 7×
• Phoenix City Prosecutor's Office v. Ybarra
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-21· cited 4×
• State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew Payne
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2013-08-21
• Jl v. Lm
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2001-06-22
• State of Arizona v. Christina Marie George
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-11-26

Other cases named State v. Poehnelt

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• State v. Poehnelt
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2010-02-23
• State v. Poehnelt
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2009-11-24