New Mexico Court of Appeals· 9/11/1998
State v. Gardner
Citations
- 967 P.2d 465
- 126 N.M. 125
- 1998 NMCA 160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court rejects substantial compliance argument that would relax the twenty-minute time period
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donnelly, Hartz, Pickard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-05-18· cited 122×
- State v. DedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-11-17· cited 121×
- State v. DuarteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-12-07· cited 81×
- State v. MarquezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-11-18· cited 44×
- State v. OnsurezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-05-13· cited 35×
- State v. ChristmasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-12-28· cited 30×
- State v. DayNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-01-08· cited 29×
- State v. CollinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-03-04· cited 28×
- State v. HansonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-03-09· cited 23×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-02-15· cited 21×
- New Mexico Department of Health v. ComptonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-09-05· cited 20×
- State v. WillieNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-12-17· cited 16×
- State v. VialpandoCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2004-04-01· cited 14×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2016-01-25· cited 14×
- State v. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-08-28· cited 13×
- State v. FilsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-02-17· cited 13×
- State v. TomNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-05-25· cited 11×
- State v. MarquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-07-28· cited 11×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2020-05-18· cited 11×
- State v. WillieNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-02-28· cited 10×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court· 1960-10-06· cited 147×
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-12-06· cited 72×
- Bettini v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 63×
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-02-20· cited 44×
- Glasmann v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals· 1986-04-17· cited 30×
- State v. HoeffelNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-06-04· cited 28×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-09-13· cited 27×
- Lane v. LaneNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-01-12· cited 23×
- State v. McCaslinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1994-11-02· cited 23×
- State v. RemsburgIdaho Court of Appeals· 1994-10-06· cited 22×
- State v. KostTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1990-05-23· cited 20×
- In Re Sum. Susp. of Driver's License of RamosAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-05-14· cited 19×
- State v. KirnHawaii Supreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 18×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1994-11-10· cited 16×
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-09-09· cited 15×
- Citizens for Incorporation, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-06-02· cited 14×
- State v. WatkinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-08-28· cited 13×
- State v. BaldersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-01-24· cited 12×
- People v. BoughnerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-03-20· cited 10×
- State v. BearlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-03-07· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.