Glasmann v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that regulation requiring “close and continuous observation” does not require officer to stare fixedly at test subject, rather, compliance is question of fact
• stating the officer need not “stare fixedly at a test subject for twenty minutes”
• stating the officer need not \stare fixedly at a test subject for twenty minutes\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).