State v. Remsburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the observation period was sufficient where, although the officer’s sight was at times directed elsewhere, during the entire period the officer was in close proximity to the defendant and was able to use his remaining senses
• fixed eye contact not required if the officer remains with defendant, despite occasionally averting his eyes while he read the advisory form to defendant and programmed device

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).